(Re: Carbines) Eraring Energy v Babcock International Ltd & Ors [2005] NSWDDT 9
For the reasons given in the separate determination in the Murray proceedings, the identified paragraphs of the amended s 25B notice do not raise determinations of issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim for Contribution Pursuant to S 5 of the Law Reform Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1946 Arising From Asbestos Exposure Liability / Separate Determination by Consent Under Pt 31 R 2 of the Supreme Court Rules as to Whether Disputed Parts of a S 25 B Notice Contain or Reflect Determinations of Issues of a General Nature
- Outcome
- The Tribunal found that the specified paragraphs of the amended s 25B notice do not raise determinations of issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989; costs were reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['asbestos Exposure' 'contribution Between Tortfeasors' 's 25 B Notice' 'issues of a General Nature' 'separate Determination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim for Contribution Pursuant to S 5 of the Law Reform Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1946 Arising From Asbestos Exposure Liability / Separate Determination by Consent Under Pt 31 R 2 of the Supreme Court Rules as to Whether Disputed Parts of a S 25 B Notice Contain or Reflect Determinations of Issues of a General Nature
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the disputed parts of the amended s 25B notice filed by Eraring Energy contain or reflect determinations by the Tribunal of issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.']
Ratio Decidendi
For the reasons given in the separate determination in the Murray proceedings, the identified paragraphs of the amended s 25B notice do not raise determinations of issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.
Court Disposition
The Tribunal found that the specified paragraphs of the amended s 25B notice do not raise determinations of issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989; costs were reserved.
Orders
- ['Paragraphs A(2), D(2) and (3), F(1), H(1), I(1) to (24), J(1)(2), M(1) and N(1) of the amended s 25B notice filed by the cross-claimant do not raise determinations of issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.' 'Question of costs reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment