Amaca Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales; Re Zaluga [2006] NSWDDT 41

Amaca Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales; Re Zaluga [2006] NSWDDT 41

The matters raised in items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice in this case are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 because they concern specific findings relating to one party and do not have a general application beyond the immediate litigation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 September 2006
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim in Dust Diseases Litigation / Interlocutory Ruling on S 25 B Notice
Outcome
Items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.
Legal Topics
['asbestos Litigation' 'dust Diseases' 'issue Estoppel' 're Litigation of General Issues' 's 25 B Dust Diseases Tribunal Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Cross Claim in Dust Diseases Litigation / Interlocutory Ruling on S 25 B Notice

  1. 1 ['Whether the matters raised in items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice are issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989']

Ratio Decidendi

The matters raised in items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice in this case are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 because they concern specific findings relating to one party and do not have a general application beyond the immediate litigation.

Court Disposition

Items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.

Orders

  • []