Amaca Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales; Re Zaluga [2006] NSWDDT 41
The matters raised in items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice in this case are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 because they concern specific findings relating to one party and do not have a general application beyond the immediate litigation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim in Dust Diseases Litigation / Interlocutory Ruling on S 25 B Notice
- Outcome
- Items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.
- Legal Topics
- ['asbestos Litigation' 'dust Diseases' 'issue Estoppel' 're Litigation of General Issues' 's 25 B Dust Diseases Tribunal Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim in Dust Diseases Litigation / Interlocutory Ruling on S 25 B Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the matters raised in items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice are issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989']
Ratio Decidendi
The matters raised in items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice in this case are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 because they concern specific findings relating to one party and do not have a general application beyond the immediate litigation.
Court Disposition
Items 1 and 2 of the s 25B notice are not issues of a general nature within the meaning of s 25B of the Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment