Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Dinoris (No 2) [2015] FCA 1025
The invoice is admissible as a business record under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) because it was received and retained by Auctioneering Link in the ordinary course of its business for dual purposes, and any asserted unfairness does not substantially outweigh its probative value such as to warrant exclusion under s 135.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure / Evidentiary Ruling on Admissibility of Business Record
- Outcome
- admissibility of invoice as business record allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['hearsay Rule' 'business Records Exception' 'admissibility of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure / Evidentiary Ruling on Admissibility of Business Record
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the invoice is admissible as a business record under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)' 'Whether the Court should exercise its discretion under s 135 of the Evidence Act to exclude the invoice']
Ratio Decidendi
The invoice is admissible as a business record under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) because it was received and retained by Auctioneering Link in the ordinary course of its business for dual purposes, and any asserted unfairness does not substantially outweigh its probative value such as to warrant exclusion under s 135.
Court Disposition
admissibility of invoice as business record allowed
Orders
- ['The tender of the invoice as a business record of Auctioneering Link is allowed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment