Ashglow Pty Ltd as trustee for Ashglow Trust v Castano [2008] NSWLC 29

Ashglow Pty Ltd as trustee for Ashglow Trust v Castano [2008] NSWLC 29

The contract was objectively formed between Ashglow and Mr. Castano as an individual based on direct representations at the time of contracting, with no clear disclosure of a corporate principal. Mr. Castano breached key contract terms regarding the quality and specification of the concreting work. The damages for rectification claimed by Ashglow were both reasonable and necessary due to loss of both aesthetic and practical utility, entitling Ashglow to full rectification costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Verdict for the Plaintiff
Legal Topics
['damages' 'agency' 'undisclosed Principal' 'contractual Breach' 'remedial Work']
['building and Construction' 'contract Law'] ['damages' 'agency' 'undisclosed Principal' 'contractual Breach' 'remedial Work']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the contract was between Ashglow and Mr. Castano as an individual or with Wildstorm Pty Ltd (Alpha Concrete Spraying & Pumping)' 'Whether Mr. Castano breached terms of the contract regarding the quality and specifications of concreting work' 'Whether Ashglow is entitled to damages for rectification and remedial works and if such damages are reasonable and necessary']

Ratio Decidendi

The contract was objectively formed between Ashglow and Mr. Castano as an individual based on direct representations at the time of contracting, with no clear disclosure of a corporate principal. Mr. Castano breached key contract terms regarding the quality and specification of the concreting work. The damages for rectification claimed by Ashglow were both reasonable and necessary due to loss of both aesthetic and practical utility, entitling Ashglow to full rectification costs.

Court Disposition

Verdict for the Plaintiff

Orders

  • ['Verdict for the Plaintiff' 'Judgment in the sum of $37,446.00' 'Interest is payable on the judgment amount' 'Plaintiff awarded costs on an ordinary basis (absent contrary application)' 'Any security for costs held against Plaintiff to be released to Plaintiff on or before 3rd December 2008' 'Parties to prepare a...