Russell v Edwards & Anor [2006] NSWCA 19

Russell v Edwards & Anor [2006] NSWCA 19

The direct cause of Mr Russell's injury was his self-induced intoxication, which impaired his ability to exercise reasonable care and led him to misjudge the depth of the pool. Section 50(2) of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) applies, barring recovery. Ignorance of alcohol quantity required for intoxication does not render intoxication involuntary under s 50(5).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['negligence' 'intoxication' "occupier's Liability" 'contributory Negligence' 'civil Liability Act 2002 (nsw)']
['torts'] ['negligence' 'intoxication' "occupier's Liability" 'contributory Negligence' 'civil Liability Act 2002 (nsw)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether s 50 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) exempts respondents from liability due to plaintiff's self-induced intoxication" "Meaning of 'self-induced intoxication' under s 50(5)" 'Determination of a single cause of injury under s 50(1)']

Ratio Decidendi

The direct cause of Mr Russell's injury was his self-induced intoxication, which impaired his ability to exercise reasonable care and led him to misjudge the depth of the pool. Section 50(2) of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) applies, barring recovery. Ignorance of alcohol quantity required for intoxication does not render intoxication involuntary under s 50(5).

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']