McFarland v R [2021] NSWCCA 79
The aggregate sentence imposed (seven years imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years and four months) was within the proper exercise of sentencing discretion, reflecting the totality of criminality and seriousness especially given the horrific injuries, domestic violence context, and legislative guideposts. The sentence was not manifestly excessive; appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ashley McFarland; Respondent Crown: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Judgment on Leave and Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Aggravated Take and Detain, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Driving With High Range Alcohol, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashley McFarland
Applicant
Regina
Respondent Crown
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Judgment on Leave and Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the aggregate sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate application of sentencing principles in domestic violence cases
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence imposed (seven years imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years and four months) was within the proper exercise of sentencing discretion, reflecting the totality of criminality and seriousness especially given the horrific injuries, domestic violence context, and legislative guideposts. The sentence was not manifestly excessive; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment