SafeWork NSW v Powell [2018] NSWDC 104

SafeWork NSW v Powell [2018] NSWDC 104

The defendant, as sole director and shareholder of IMS, failed to ensure the implementation of required safety measures, supervision, and training in tree removal work, exposing workers to foreseeable risks of serious injury, contrary to his obligations under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. The objective seriousness, foreseeability, hazardous nature of the industry, and available preventive measures warranted a conviction and fine, mitigated by the defendant's genuine remorse, cooperation, financial hardship, and plea of guilty.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
convicted and fined
Legal Topics
['tree Removal' 'labour Hire' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'relief Under Fines Act']
['work Health and Safety' 'criminal Law'] ['tree Removal' 'labour Hire' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'relief Under Fines Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that the PCBU complied with its duty or obligation as required under s 27 and s 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011' 'Whether the defendant failed to ensure proper supervision, training, and risk controls in a hazardous industry']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, as sole director and shareholder of IMS, failed to ensure the implementation of required safety measures, supervision, and training in tree removal work, exposing workers to foreseeable risks of serious injury, contrary to his obligations under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. The objective seriousness, foreseeability, hazardous nature of the industry, and available preventive measures warranted a conviction and fine, mitigated by the defendant's genuine remorse, cooperation, financial hardship, and plea of guilty.

Court Disposition

convicted and fined

Orders

  • ['The defendant is convicted and fined $20,000 with a moiety, with that moiety to be paid to the prosecutor under s 122 of the Fines Act.' "The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's costs agreed in the sum of $17,500."]