Ashmere Cove Pty Ltd v Beekink [2007] FCA 473
The Court found that, having regard to the contentions advanced for the first to fifth applicants, it cannot be said that their case as pleaded is manifestly untenable or has no reasonable prospect of success; accordingly, the strike out motion was dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ashmere Cove Pty Ltd; Applicant: CG Super Pty Ltd; Applicant: Choral Pty Ltd; Applicant: Pullington Investments Pty Ltd; Applicant: Geraldine Gray in her capacity as executor for the late Constance Phyllis James; Applicant: Mantal Brewing Services Pty Ltd; Applicant: Catherine Emma Husk; Applicant: Mikayla Kim Dunne and Jennifer Anne Allen; Applicant: Blyth Nominees Pty Ltd; Applicant: John Andrew Maslen and Joan Carmel Maslen; Applicant: Creation Pty Ltd; Respondent: Peter Cornelius Beekink; Respondent: Hersh Solomon Majteles; Respondent: Gregory Phillip Gaunt; Respondent: Giovanni Maurizio Carrelo (Liquidator) of Knightsbridge Managed Funds Limited (In Liq); Respondent: Knightsbridge Managed Funds Limited (In Liq)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Strike Out / Interlocutory Application Motion to Strike Out Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Strike out motion dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Applications, Directors' Duties, Registered Managed Investment Schemes, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashmere Cove Pty Ltd
Applicant
CG Super Pty Ltd
Applicant
Choral Pty Ltd
Applicant
Pullington Investments Pty Ltd
Applicant
Geraldine Gray in her capacity as executor for the late Constance Phyllis James
Applicant
Mantal Brewing Services Pty Ltd
Applicant
Catherine Emma Husk
Applicant
Mikayla Kim Dunne and Jennifer Anne Allen
Applicant
Blyth Nominees Pty Ltd
Applicant
John Andrew Maslen and Joan Carmel Maslen
Applicant
Creation Pty Ltd
Applicant
Peter Cornelius Beekink
Respondent
Hersh Solomon Majteles
Respondent
Gregory Phillip Gaunt
Respondent
Giovanni Maurizio Carrelo (Liquidator) of Knightsbridge Managed Funds Limited (In Liq)
Respondent
Knightsbridge Managed Funds Limited (In Liq)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion to Strike Out / Interlocutory Application Motion to Strike Out Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the substituted statement of claim discloses no reasonable cause of action as pleaded by the first to fifth applicants
- 2 Whether the first to fifth applicants' losses are sufficiently pleaded to withstand a motion to strike out
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that, having regard to the contentions advanced for the first to fifth applicants, it cannot be said that their case as pleaded is manifestly untenable or has no reasonable prospect of success; accordingly, the strike out motion was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Strike out motion dismissed with costs
Orders
- The first to third respondents' motion filed 20 November 2006 is dismissed.
- The first to third respondents are to pay the first to fifth applicants' costs of the motion so far as they relate to the preparation and filing of revised submissions in answer to the first to third respondents' revised submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment