Ashok Kumar Duraisamy v Sydney Trains [2019] NSWSC 199
Given the plaintiff's failure to pay costs arising from earlier proceedings against the defendant on the same or substantially the same cause of action, it is appropriate that current proceedings be stayed under rule 12.10 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) until those costs are paid.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Notice of Motion (stay of Proceedings)
- Outcome
- Proceedings stayed pending payment of costs; Plaintiff to pay defendants’ costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Proceedings' 'payment of Costs' 'summary Dismissal' 'deed of Release']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Notice of Motion (stay of Proceedings)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings should be stayed pending payment of costs in earlier matters' "Effect of Deed of Release on plaintiff's claims" 'Whether summary dismissal is appropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the plaintiff's failure to pay costs arising from earlier proceedings against the defendant on the same or substantially the same cause of action, it is appropriate that current proceedings be stayed under rule 12.10 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) until those costs are paid.
Court Disposition
Proceedings stayed pending payment of costs; Plaintiff to pay defendants’ costs.
Orders
- ['Proceedings stayed pursuant to rule 12.10 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) until payment of costs in case number 2017/00347036 in the District Court and case number 2018/00125435 in the Local Court.' "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment