Findex Group Ltd v iiNet Ltd (Application by ASIC) (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1048
Further redactions as proposed by ASIC are necessary to protect public interest immunity, including redacting portions of documents where disclosure of context would be prejudicial. Plaintiffs' access must be restricted to the minimum extent necessary to uphold that immunity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Consequential Orders (other Than Costs) / Post Public Interest Immunity Determination; Further Directions and Orders on Access/redaction of Documents
- Outcome
- Orders made for ASIC to serve redacted copies of documents within 7 days and restrict access in accordance with prior court orders; no formal order as to costs at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- ['privilege' 'public Interest Immunity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders (other Than Costs) / Post Public Interest Immunity Determination; Further Directions and Orders on Access/redaction of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether further redactions are required to protect public interest immunity in documents seized from/produced by Mr McKay' "Balancing plaintiffs' access to documents with protection of public interest immunity"]
Ratio Decidendi
Further redactions as proposed by ASIC are necessary to protect public interest immunity, including redacting portions of documents where disclosure of context would be prejudicial. Plaintiffs' access must be restricted to the minimum extent necessary to uphold that immunity.
Court Disposition
Orders made for ASIC to serve redacted copies of documents within 7 days and restrict access in accordance with prior court orders; no formal order as to costs at this stage.
Orders
- ["ASIC is to serve on the plaintiff's legal representative within 7 days redacted copies of any documents within Confidential Exhibit 'A' not already served on the plaintiffs' legal representatives, such redactions to be in accordance with the documents prepared by ASIC and provided to the Court on a confidential...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment