Aslan Investments Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2019] NSWLEC 1042
All jurisdictional prerequisites being satisfied and the parties' decision being a decision the Court could make, development consent was granted in accordance with agreement reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Aslan Investments Pty Ltd; Respondent: Canterbury-Bankstown Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Post Conciliation, Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Residential Flat Building, Affordable Rental Housing, Consent Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aslan Investments Pty Ltd
Applicant
Canterbury-Bankstown Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Post Conciliation, Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for grant of development consent are satisfied
- 2 Whether development consent should be granted pursuant to parties' agreement under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
All jurisdictional prerequisites being satisfied and the parties' decision being a decision the Court could make, development consent was granted in accordance with agreement reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 222/2017, for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a three storey residential flat building comprising twenty apartments (16 x 2 bedroom and 4 x 1 bedroom apartments) over basement car parking for 23 vehicles at 144-148 Evaline...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment