Asset Holding Pty Ltd & Ors v Rosta Electrical Industries Pty Ltd (In Liq) [1995] FCA 278
There is a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt described in each statutory demand because the directing minds on both sides intended the loans to be repayable in 1996, regardless of documentation or bank facility terms; thus, the demands must be set aside under s 459H(3).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of Registrar's Decision Under S 459 G of the Corporations Law / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- statutory demands set aside; costs awarded to applicants
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'debt Existence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Registrar's Decision Under S 459 G of the Corporations Law / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there is a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt for purposes of s 459H(1)(a) of the Corporations Law']
Ratio Decidendi
There is a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt described in each statutory demand because the directing minds on both sides intended the loans to be repayable in 1996, regardless of documentation or bank facility terms; thus, the demands must be set aside under s 459H(3).
Court Disposition
statutory demands set aside; costs awarded to applicants
Orders
- ['Order made by the Registrar on 2 November 1994 set aside.' 'Statutory demand served by the respondent on or about 7 December 1993 set aside.' "Respondent to pay applicant's costs of the application under section 459G of the Corporations Law and of the application for review of the Registrar's decision."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment