Reisner v. Bratt & Anor [2004] NSWCA 22

Reisner v. Bratt & Anor [2004] NSWCA 22

The claimant did not establish a denial of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction; the primary judge correctly proceeded in her absence after she failed to indicate any availability, and the Small Claims Division had jurisdiction up to $10,000.00 at the time of commencement. Leave to appeal was rightly refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['assistance to Unrepresented Litigants' 'natural Justice' 'extension of Time' 'jurisdiction of the Local Court']
['civil Procedure'] ['assistance to Unrepresented Litigants' 'natural Justice' 'extension of Time' 'jurisdiction of the Local Court']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Extent of court's assistance to unrepresented litigants" 'Whether denial of natural justice occurred' 'Whether the Local Court had jurisdiction over the claim' 'Whether there was error in proceeding ex parte']

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant did not establish a denial of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction; the primary judge correctly proceeded in her absence after she failed to indicate any availability, and the Small Claims Division had jurisdiction up to $10,000.00 at the time of commencement. Leave to appeal was rightly refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal dismissed.' "Claimant to pay the opponent's costs."]