Assure (NSW) Pty Limited v Taouk [2016] NSWSC 1234
The defendant should pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis because the plaintiff succeeded in the removal of the caveat and the agreed interim regime ended due to the defendant's failures, but the case did not warrant indemnity costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings for Removal of Caveat / Costs Determination After Orders for Removal of Caveat
- Outcome
- Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'removal of Caveat' 'settlement Offers' 'interim Regimes Relating to Property Proceeds']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceedings for Removal of Caveat / Costs Determination After Orders for Removal of Caveat
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate order for costs following removal of caveat and particular settlement offers' 'Whether indemnity costs or ordinary costs should be ordered']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant should pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis because the plaintiff succeeded in the removal of the caveat and the agreed interim regime ended due to the defendant's failures, but the case did not warrant indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis.
Orders
- ["The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment