ASX15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1412
Since the appellants' applications for a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) visa were made before 1 July 2017 and failed to satisfy the requirements of criterion 3001 in Schedule 3 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), neither the Tribunal nor the Court had power to grant the visas or to consider...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Orders
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review of Visa Decisions' 'medical Treatment (visitor) (class Ub) Visas' 'schedule 3 Criterion 3001' 'transitional Regulations']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether failure to satisfy criterion 3001 of Schedule 3 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) precluded grant of visa' 'Whether Tribunal or Court could take into account compassionate circumstances' "Whether amendments to Migration Regulations applied to appellants' applications"]
Ratio Decidendi
Since the appellants' applications for a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) visa were made before 1 July 2017 and failed to satisfy the requirements of criterion 3001 in Schedule 3 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), neither the Tribunal nor the Court had power to grant the visas or to consider compassionate circumstances. Amendments to the regulations after 1 July 2017 did not apply to these applications.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeals be dismissed with costs in NSD 1262, NSD 1263, and NSD 1264 of 2017.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment