ATG Carlton Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2025] NSWLEC 1107

ATG Carlton Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2025] NSWLEC 1107

The Court held that all jurisdictional prerequisites for granting consent to the DA, including the cl 4.6 variation to the FSR development standard, were satisfied; the development was permitted and appropriate, and the parties' agreement was within the Court's power to make as required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act. The DA was approved subject to agreed conditions.

Parties
Applicant: ATG Carlton Pty Ltd; Respondent: Georges River Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Determination After Conciliation Conference
Outcome
Development application approved; appeal upheld
Legal Topics
Development Consent, Floor Space Ratio, Clause 4.6 Variation, Jurisdictional Preconditions, Design Excellence
Planning and Environment Law Development Consent Floor Space Ratio Clause 4.6 Variation Jurisdictional Preconditions Design Excellence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ATG Carlton Pty Ltd

Applicant

Georges River Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Development Application Appeal / Determination After Conciliation Conference

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the development application for a change of use to self-storage and associated works should be approved.
  2. 2 Whether a variation to the floor space ratio development standard under cl 4.6 of Georges River LEP 2021 is justified.
  3. 3 Whether the statutory and jurisdictional prerequisites for consent are satisfied.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that all jurisdictional prerequisites for granting consent to the DA, including the cl 4.6 variation to the FSR development standard, were satisfied; the development was permitted and appropriate, and the parties' agreement was within the Court's power to make as required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act. The DA was approved subject to agreed conditions.

Court Disposition

Development application approved; appeal upheld

Orders

  • The Applicant's request under cl 4.6 to vary the floor space ratio development standard is upheld.
  • The appeal is upheld.