Tyropanis v Smurf's Traffic Management Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2007] NSWSC 123
Plaintiff is entitled to leave to proceed against defendant company in voluntary liquidation where claim is insured, pursuant to s 500(2) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and any judgment obtained may not be enforced without leave of the court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim Against Company in Voluntary Liquidation / Application for Leave to Proceed
- Outcome
- Leave to proceed granted; enforcement of judgment only with further leave; costs ordered as costs in cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up Voluntarily' 'stay of Proceedings' 'leave to Proceed Against Company in Liquidation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim Against Company in Voluntary Liquidation / Application for Leave to Proceed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should leave to proceed be granted against a company in voluntary liquidation?' 'Can judgment against such a company be enforced without court’s leave?']
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff is entitled to leave to proceed against defendant company in voluntary liquidation where claim is insured, pursuant to s 500(2) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and any judgment obtained may not be enforced without leave of the court.
Court Disposition
Leave to proceed granted; enforcement of judgment only with further leave; costs ordered as costs in cause.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff granted leave to file affidavit of S Brigstocke sworn 19 February 2007.' 'Leave to proceed against defendant in District Court proceeding 5174 of 2005 granted under s 500(2) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Any judgment obtained in those District Court proceedings not to be enforced without further leave...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment