Dumitrov v S C Johnson & Son Superannuation Pty Ltd & Anor (No 3) [2007] NSWSC 66
The plaintiff's counter-offer was clearly an offer of $115,000 plus costs and was capable of acceptance, with costs to be assessed or agreed if no specified figure was provided; the circumstances relied on by the second defendant did not justify departing from the Calderbank approach.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff awarded party and party costs to the date of the offer and indemnity costs thereafter.
- Legal Topics
- ['calderbank Offer' 'indemnity Costs' 'party and Party Costs' 'settlement Offers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff's 7 March 2005 counter-offer was capable of immediate acceptance despite stating that professional costs and disbursements would be advised shortly." 'Whether the approach in Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 1 All ER 333 should be followed in determining costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's counter-offer was clearly an offer of $115,000 plus costs and was capable of acceptance, with costs to be assessed or agreed if no specified figure was provided; the circumstances relied on by the second defendant did not justify departing from the Calderbank approach.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff awarded party and party costs to the date of the offer and indemnity costs thereafter.
Orders
- ['Orders made in terms of the amended short minutes of order proffered on behalf of the plaintiff, except for the declarations and the first paragraph of the order.' 'Orders stayed until 5 pm on Tuesday 20 February 2007.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment