ATS17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 226
The Tribunal did not fail to comply with s 424A because the Pastor's oral evidence and related materials were not 'information' within the meaning of the section, being relevant only to credibility rather than a rejection, denial, or undermining of the protection claim. The Tribunal was not obliged to invite the appellant under s 425 nor provide a running commentary regarding its evaluation of evidence, as the appellant was otherwise put on notice of the dispositive issues.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'procedural Fairness' 'migration']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Tribunal failed to comply with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by not giving particulars of Pastor's evidence" "What constitutes 'information' for purposes of s 424A" "Whether Tribunal erred in failing to invite appellant under s 425 in relation to Pastor's oral evidence"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not fail to comply with s 424A because the Pastor's oral evidence and related materials were not 'information' within the meaning of the section, being relevant only to credibility rather than a rejection, denial, or undermining of the protection claim. The Tribunal was not obliged to invite the appellant under s 425 nor provide a running commentary regarding its evaluation of evidence, as the appellant was otherwise put on notice of the dispositive issues.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment