Attorney-General for New South Wales v Gallagher [2006] NSWSC 420
Because the defendant's visas had been cancelled and deportation was expected, the fixed hearing should be vacated; however, because the necessary immigration steps had not yet occurred, the proceedings had to remain on foot and the interim orders remain in place.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application Concerning Orders Under the Crimes (serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 / Application by the Parties to Vacate a Fixed Hearing Date and Make Ancillary Orders After Interim Orders
- Outcome
- Hearing date vacated; proceedings and interim orders to remain on foot; matter listed for mention.
- Legal Topics
- ['interim Orders' 'vacated Hearing Date' 'visa Cancellation' 'deportation' 'proceedings Remaining on Foot']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Application Concerning Orders Under the Crimes (serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 / Application by the Parties to Vacate a Fixed Hearing Date and Make Ancillary Orders After Interim Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the hearing fixed for 8 May 2006 should be vacated in light of the cancellation of the defendant's visas and anticipated deportation." 'Whether the proceedings and interim orders should remain on foot until the foreshadowed immigration steps occur.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendant's visas had been cancelled and deportation was expected, the fixed hearing should be vacated; however, because the necessary immigration steps had not yet occurred, the proceedings had to remain on foot and the interim orders remain in place.
Court Disposition
Hearing date vacated; proceedings and interim orders to remain on foot; matter listed for mention.
Orders
- ['Orders made in the document entitled "Draft short minutes of order" initialled and dated by the judge.' 'The matter is to be mentioned again before McClellan CJ at CL at 4.30pm on Wednesday 10 May 2006.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment