Attorney General of NSW v Collings (Preliminary) [2024] NSWSC 135
On the material tendered, the statutory requirements for interim orders are satisfied, and the psychiatric evidence supports that the matters alleged, if proved, would justify an extension order; accordingly, interim and ancillary relief is granted.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interim Orders in Application for Extension of Forensic Patient Status
- Outcome
- Interim and ancillary orders granted
- Legal Topics
- ['forensic Patient' 'extension of Status' 'interim Relief' 'mental Health' 'risk Assessment']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Orders in Application for Extension of Forensic Patient Status
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether interim orders for extension of forensic patient status should be granted' 'Whether formal requirements under the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 are satisfied' 'Whether risk assessment under the Act supports interim orders']
Ratio Decidendi
On the material tendered, the statutory requirements for interim orders are satisfied, and the psychiatric evidence supports that the matters alleged, if proved, would justify an extension order; accordingly, interim and ancillary relief is granted.
Court Disposition
Interim and ancillary orders granted
Orders
- ['Order pursuant to s 126(5) appointing two qualified psychiatrists, registered psychologists or medical practitioners to conduct separate examinations and furnish reports by a date to be fixed by the Court, and directing the defendant to attend those examinations.' "Order pursuant to ss 130 and 131 for interim...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment