Regina v Heatley [2003] NSWCCA 163

Because the parties reached and implemented an accommodation that addressed the accused's defence requirements and the appellant's concerns, the appeal was concluded and dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 18 June 2003
Procedural Posture: Appeal Under S 5 F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Concerning Orders for Production of Documents During a Criminal Trial / Court of Criminal Appeal; Appeal Adjourned Part Heard and Then Mentioned Before a Single Judge
Outcome: APPEAL DISMISSED
Legal Topics: ['production of Documents' 'interlocutory Appeal' 'trial Judge Orders' 'criminal Appeal Act 1912, S5 F']

['criminal Law' 'criminal Procedure'] ['production of Documents' 'interlocutory Appeal' 'trial Judge Orders' 'criminal Appeal Act 1912, S5 F']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under S 5 F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Concerning Orders for Production of Documents During a Criminal Trial / Court of Criminal Appeal; Appeal Adjourned Part Heard and Then Mentioned Before a Single Judge

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether the appeal concerning the trial judge's orders for production of certain documents should be dismissed after the parties reached and implemented an accommodation."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the parties reached and implemented an accommodation that addressed the accused's defence requirements and the appellant's concerns, the appeal was concluded and dismissed.

Court Disposition

APPEAL DISMISSED

Orders

['The appeal be dismissed.']