Regina v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 586
The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is not inconsistent with the appointment of special counsel, and its provisions are sufficiently broad to permit such appointment. However, at this stage, it is premature to appoint special counsel, and the decision is adjourned until after further material is received at the closed court hearing scheduled for 6 March 2006.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Application for Appointment of Special Counsel
- Outcome
- Application for appointment of special counsel adjourned
- Legal Topics
- ['public Interest Immunity' 'special Counsel' 'disclosure' 'national Security Information' 'fair Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Application for Appointment of Special Counsel
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 permits the appointment of special counsel in criminal proceedings.' 'Whether the appointment of special counsel is premature or undesirable at this stage in the proceedings.']
Ratio Decidendi
The National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 is not inconsistent with the appointment of special counsel, and its provisions are sufficiently broad to permit such appointment. However, at this stage, it is premature to appoint special counsel, and the decision is adjourned until after further material is received at the closed court hearing scheduled for 6 March 2006.
Court Disposition
Application for appointment of special counsel adjourned
Orders
- ['Application for appointment of special counsel adjourned to 6 March 2006']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment