AU -v- Commission for Children & Young People [2002] NSWADT 78
Based on the expert report, evidence and credibility findings, AU was found to pose a risk to children and could not be declared not a 'prohibited person' under the Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: AU; Respondent: Commission for Children & Young People
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaration / Decision
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Prohibited Person Status, Serious Sex Offence, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Risk Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
AU
Applicant
Commission for Children & Young People
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaration / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether AU is a prohibited person under the Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 with respect to a conviction for homosexual intercourse with a minor
- 2 Whether AU poses a risk to the safety of children warranting continued application of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
Based on the expert report, evidence and credibility findings, AU was found to pose a risk to children and could not be declared not a 'prohibited person' under the Act.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- This application is refused. The Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 continues to apply to AU for the offence for which he was indicted on 9 April 1997.
- In the Community Services Division of the Tribunal, it is an offence to publish or broadcast the name of any person involved in proceedings before the Tribunal, pursuant to Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 s126(1).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment