Aubrey Robert Mills v North West Local Land Services [2016] NSWLEC 100
The application to vacate hearing dates was dismissed because there was insufficient evidence that further material would be relevant or assist, the notice to produce and request for particulars did not justify vacating, the applicant was responsible for slippage, and the interests of justice did not require a vacation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Class 3 Appeal Proceedings / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
- Outcome
- Application to vacate hearing dates dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['application to Vacate Hearing Dates' 'further Evidence' 'discretionary Power Under Civil Procedure Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application in Class 3 Appeal Proceedings / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing dates should be vacated to permit further evidence and address procedural matters']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to vacate hearing dates was dismissed because there was insufficient evidence that further material would be relevant or assist, the notice to produce and request for particulars did not justify vacating, the applicant was responsible for slippage, and the interests of justice did not require a vacation.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate hearing dates dismissed
Orders
- ['Application to vacate hearing dates dismissed' 'Court to consider amendments to timetable if parties cannot agree']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment