Auburn City Council v Hussein Hussein [2010] NSWLEC 77
Carrying out development for use as a boxing gymnasium without development consent on the subject premises breaches s 76A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the respondent, as controlling manager, is liable for the unauthorised use; thus, declaratory and injunctive relief is warranted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Auburn City Council; Respondent: Hussein Hussein
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Enforcement / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory and injunctive relief granted; costs ordered against respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Development Without Consent, Injunction, Recreational Facility Consent, Breach of Development Control
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Auburn City Council
Applicant
Hussein Hussein
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the use of premises as a boxing gymnasium without development consent constitutes a breach of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether Hussein Hussein is responsible for the development being carried out
Ratio Decidendi
Carrying out development for use as a boxing gymnasium without development consent on the subject premises breaches s 76A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the respondent, as controlling manager, is liable for the unauthorised use; thus, declaratory and injunctive relief is warranted.
Court Disposition
Declaratory and injunctive relief granted; costs ordered against respondent.
Orders
- Declaration that respondent is carrying out development at Unit 4, 354 Chisholm Road, Auburn for use as a boxing gymnasium without consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- Respondent and his agents restrained from using or causing the premises to be used for the purpose of a boxing gymnasium, or any other purpose without prior Council consent in accordance with the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment