Auburn City Council v Strak [2015] NSWLEC 180
The Court exercised its discretion under r 7.36 to refer the respondent for pro bono legal assistance and ordered provision of a Polish interpreter at trial, given his lack of means and language difficulties, and declined to order further mediation.
- Parties
- Applicant: Auburn City Council; Respondent: Jan Strak
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Enforcement Proceedings / Pre Trial Ruling
- Outcome
- Pre-trial orders granted in part; respondent referred to Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance and provision of interpreter ordered; request for further mediation refused.
- Legal Topics
- Pro Bono Referrals, Interpreter Assistance, Mediation, Civil Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Auburn City Council
Applicant
Jan Strak
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement Proceedings / Pre Trial Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent should be referred to a Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance
- 2 Whether the Court should provide an interpreter for the respondent at trial
- 3 Whether a further mediation should be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
The Court exercised its discretion under r 7.36 to refer the respondent for pro bono legal assistance and ordered provision of a Polish interpreter at trial, given his lack of means and language difficulties, and declined to order further mediation.
Court Disposition
Pre-trial orders granted in part; respondent referred to Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance and provision of interpreter ordered; request for further mediation refused.
Orders
- Under r 7.36 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 the respondent is referred to the Registrar of the Court for a referral to a barrister or solicitor on the Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance by way of advice and representation of the respondent at trial.
- The Registrar of the Court is to arrange for a Polish interpreter for the respondent at trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment