Auburn Council v Nehme, E. [1998] NSWLEC 14
Section 109B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 applies independently of the abandonment provisions in s107; so long as a development consent has been granted and is in force, it authorises the carrying out of approved development regardless of any alleged abandonment of actual use. Therefore, the Council's claim based on abandonment fails due to the effect of s109B, and the application must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Auburn Council; Respondent: E. Nehme
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Existing Use Rights, Development Consent, Abandonment of Use
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Auburn Council
Applicant
E. Nehme
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the use of premises as squash courts had been abandoned within the meaning of s107 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether s109B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 preserves the development consent despite alleged abandonment
Ratio Decidendi
Section 109B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 applies independently of the abandonment provisions in s107; so long as a development consent has been granted and is in force, it authorises the carrying out of approved development regardless of any alleged abandonment of actual use. Therefore, the Council's claim based on abandonment fails due to the effect of s109B, and the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application be dismissed.
- Exhibits be returned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment