Audio-visual Copyright Society Ltd v Australian Record Industry Association Ltd [2000] ACopyT 1
Part VII Division 2 and ss 153F to 153K contemplate declaration of a collecting society by reference to all government copies or a class of government copies, not by reference to separate categories of copyright ownership affected by the same act of copying. The statutory references to the relevant collecting society, the overlap provisions in s 153J, and the remuneration procedure in s 153K are inconsistent with multiple collecting societies having separate statutory collection rights for the same government copying. The preliminary question was therefore answered No.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for a Declaration Under S153 F of the Copyright Act 1968 / Preliminary Question
- Outcome
- Preliminary question answered No.
- Legal Topics
- ['government Copying' 'collecting Societies' 'equitable Remuneration' 'classes of Government Copies' 'sound Broadcasts and Television Broadcasts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for a Declaration Under S153 F of the Copyright Act 1968 / Preliminary Question
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a specified class of government copies under s153F(5) of the Copyright Act 1968 may be defined by reference to categories of copyright ownership.' 'Whether more than one collecting society may be declared for a single act or class of government copying involving transmissions of sound broadcasts or television broadcasts.' 'Whether the making by government of a single copy engages one collecting society or may be split between collecting societies representing different copyright owners.']
Ratio Decidendi
Part VII Division 2 and ss 153F to 153K contemplate declaration of a collecting society by reference to all government copies or a class of government copies, not by reference to separate categories of copyright ownership affected by the same act of copying. The statutory references to the relevant collecting society, the overlap provisions in s 153J, and the remuneration procedure in s 153K are inconsistent with multiple collecting societies having separate statutory collection rights for the same government copying. The preliminary question was therefore answered No.
Court Disposition
Preliminary question answered No.
Orders
- ['The Tribunal answers the preliminary question set out in its reasons "No".']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment