Audio-Visual Copyright Society Limited v Foxtel Management Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] ACopyT 2
In the absence of evidence supporting a more complex approach, dividing the total remuneration equally among the channels for subscribers with access to less than all nine channels is equitable; the value of simplicity is significant in determining remuneration in these circumstances.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Determination / Determination of Equitable Remuneration for Retransmission of Less Than Nine Multichannels
- Outcome
- Screenrights' (Applicant's) proposed method for division of remuneration accepted.
- Legal Topics
- ['equitable Remuneration' 'retransmission of Multichannels']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Determination / Determination of Equitable Remuneration for Retransmission of Less Than Nine Multichannels
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate method of determining equitable remuneration for retransmission of fewer than nine new multichannels by Foxtel?']
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of evidence supporting a more complex approach, dividing the total remuneration equally among the channels for subscribers with access to less than all nine channels is equitable; the value of simplicity is significant in determining remuneration in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Screenrights' (Applicant's) proposed method for division of remuneration accepted.
Orders
- ["The parties are to file an agreed form of orders reflecting the Tribunal's position by close of business Monday 27 August 2012."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment