R v Youseff (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 1261

R v Youseff (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 1261

In the circumstances, having regard to the medical evidence of Ms Jones's recent birth and related health issues, her care responsibilities, the absence of practical ability to travel without prejudicing her health or the infant, and taking into account advances in AVL technology, existing court facilities, and judicial guidance in case law, it would not be unfair to require evidence via AVL. Suitable arrangements mitigate any potential unfairness, and if needed, appropriate jury directions may be given.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex (Crown); Accused: Bahra Youseff
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Murder Trial
Outcome
Ms Jones to give evidence by AVL from Queensland as directed at a procedural stage of the trial.
Legal Topics
Audio Visual Evidence, Witness Direction, Fair Trial, Witness From Interstate
Criminal Procedure Audio Visual Evidence Witness Direction Fair Trial Witness From Interstate

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex (Crown)

Prosecutor

Bahra Youseff

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Murder Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Ms Jones should be directed to give evidence via audio-visual link from Queensland under s 5B of the Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether directing the evidence by AVL would be unfair to the accused

Ratio Decidendi

In the circumstances, having regard to the medical evidence of Ms Jones's recent birth and related health issues, her care responsibilities, the absence of practical ability to travel without prejudicing her health or the infant, and taking into account advances in AVL technology, existing court facilities, and judicial guidance in case law, it would not be unfair to require evidence via AVL. Suitable arrangements mitigate any potential unfairness, and if needed, appropriate jury directions may be given.

Court Disposition

Ms Jones to give evidence by AVL from Queensland as directed at a procedural stage of the trial.

Orders

  • Ms Jones be directed to appear and give evidence via audio visual link from Queensland pursuant to s 5B of the Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998 (NSW)