R v Qaumi & Ors (AVL) [2015] NSWSC 1711

R v Qaumi & Ors (AVL) [2015] NSWSC 1711

It is established that suppression and court closure are necessary to protect witness safety and the administration of justice at the pre-trial stage. AVL directions are permitted for witnesses A, B, J, and K based on compelling evidence of risk, psychological impact, and interests of justice. However, all other applications for AVL directions are refused due to insufficient evidence at this stage.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Hearing
Outcome
Applications for AVL directions granted in respect of witnesses A, B, J, and K at the pre-trial hearing; all other AVL applications refused; suppression and non-publication orders made; court closure ordered during evidence of informant witnesses at pre-trial.
Legal Topics
['audio Visual Link' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders' 'court Closure' 'protection of Witnesses' 'administration of Justice']
['criminal Law'] ['audio Visual Link' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders' 'court Closure' 'protection of Witnesses' 'administration of Justice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Should certain Crown witnesses be permitted to give evidence at the pre-trial hearing via audio visual link?' 'Should suppression and non-publication orders be made regarding witness identities and evidence?' 'Should the Court be closed during evidence of informant witnesses?']

Ratio Decidendi

It is established that suppression and court closure are necessary to protect witness safety and the administration of justice at the pre-trial stage. AVL directions are permitted for witnesses A, B, J, and K based on compelling evidence of risk, psychological impact, and interests of justice. However, all other applications for AVL directions are refused due to insufficient evidence at this stage.

Court Disposition

Applications for AVL directions granted in respect of witnesses A, B, J, and K at the pre-trial hearing; all other AVL applications refused; suppression and non-publication orders made; court closure ordered during evidence of informant witnesses at pre-trial.

Orders

  • ["Each of the persons known as witnesses 'A', 'B', 'J', and 'K' permitted to give evidence at the pre-trial hearing via audio visual link pursuant to s 5B of the Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998 (NSW)." 'Other applications for directions under s 5B refused.' "Witnesses identified as 'A' to 'L'...