Suitela v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 698

The application was dismissed as no notice of motion or supporting material was filed in accordance with the procedural orders, and no reasonable explanation was provided for the non-compliance.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 08 July 2003
Procedural Posture: Judicial Review Application / Dismissal Following Non Compliance With Procedural Orders
Outcome: Application dismissed. Applicants to pay first respondent's costs of $2,500.
Legal Topics: ['judicial Review' 'migration' 'extension of Time' 'procedural Compliance']

['immigration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['judicial Review' 'migration' 'extension of Time' 'procedural Compliance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Dismissal Following Non Compliance With Procedural Orders

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the application should be dismissed due to failure to comply with orders to file notice of motion and supporting material']

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed as no notice of motion or supporting material was filed in accordance with the procedural orders, and no reasonable explanation was provided for the non-compliance.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed. Applicants to pay first respondent's costs of $2,500.

Orders

['The application be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the first respondent's costs in the matter in the sum of $2,500."]