Secretary, Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Auen Grain Pty Ltd; Greentree; Merrywinebone Pty Ltd; Harris (No 3) [2020] NSWLEC 129
The Court granted leave to rely on specified further evidence where it was responsive to defendants' objections, related to matters apparently admitted or not previously disputed, or was necessary to address transitional arrangements for category-2 regulated land, because the late service did not create irremediable prejudice and the proceedings would not have been completed within the allocated time in any event. Leave was refused for evidence concerning provenance of aerial and satellite images, the amended s 13.32 certificate, and the further affidavit of Mr Spiers, because those matters were not discretely raised by defendants' objections, were served late without satisfactory...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 5 Criminal Proceedings Concerning Land Clearing Offences / Notice of Motion During Opening Address Seeking Leave to File Amended Notices Under S 247 J of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (nsw) and Rely on Further Evidence
- Outcome
- Motion allowed in part; leave granted for specified further evidence, leave refused for other evidence, and costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['late Prosecution Evidence' 'preliminary Disclosure' 'native Vegetation Clearing Offences' 'evidentiary Certificates' 'prejudice and Fairness in Criminal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 5 Criminal Proceedings Concerning Land Clearing Offences / Notice of Motion During Opening Address Seeking Leave to File Amended Notices Under S 247 J of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (nsw) and Rely on Further Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the prosecutor should be granted leave to file amended notices under s 247J of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) adding further evidence after commencement of the trial.' "Whether the further evidence was relevant, admissible, responsive to defendants' objections or apparent admissions, and whether its late service caused irremediable prejudice." 'Whether leave should be granted for particular categories of further evidence, including evidence about native vegetation and landholders, provenance of aerial and satellite images, evidence responsive to objections, and evidence about transitional arrangements.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted leave to rely on specified further evidence where it was responsive to defendants' objections, related to matters apparently admitted or not previously disputed, or was necessary to address transitional arrangements for category-2 regulated land, because the late service did not create irremediable prejudice and the proceedings would not have been completed within the allocated time in any event. Leave was refused for evidence concerning provenance of aerial and satellite images, the amended s 13.32 certificate, and the further affidavit of Mr Spiers, because those matters were not discretely raised by defendants' objections, were served late without satisfactory...
Court Disposition
Motion allowed in part; leave granted for specified further evidence, leave refused for other evidence, and costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 68(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), the prosecutor is granted leave to file Amended Notices under s 247J of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) by adding specified evidence, including affidavits of Leanne Jago, Michael William Brooks in part, Scott Terrence Drady in part, Jeremy...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment