AUF18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCAFC 222
The Secretary breached s 473CB(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by failing to take reasonable steps to identify and provide to the Immigration Assessment Authority material relevant to the review, specifically the Human Rights Documents. This breach was material as it deprived the Authority of potentially critical corroborative evidence, affecting the Authority's ability to carry out the review required by the legislation and amounting to jurisdictional error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment of the Federal Circuit Court set aside; matter remitted for reconsideration; parties to file agreed orders on costs and implementation.
- Legal Topics
- ['s 473 Cb(1)(c) Obligation' 'migration Act Pt 7 Aa' 'fast Track Review' 'judicial Review' 'duty to Identify Relevant Materials' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Secretary breached s 473CB(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by not taking reasonable steps to locate and provide relevant documents to the Immigration Assessment Authority' 'Whether the breach was material and resulted in the Authority failing to carry out the required review, amounting to jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary breached s 473CB(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by failing to take reasonable steps to identify and provide to the Immigration Assessment Authority material relevant to the review, specifically the Human Rights Documents. This breach was material as it deprived the Authority of potentially critical corroborative evidence, affecting the Authority's ability to carry out the review required by the legislation and amounting to jurisdictional error.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment of the Federal Circuit Court set aside; matter remitted for reconsideration; parties to file agreed orders on costs and implementation.
Orders
- ["The name of the first respondent be changed to 'Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs'." 'Within seven days, the parties file any agreed minute of orders to give effect to the reasons for judgment and in relation to costs (both of the proceeding at first instance and the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment