Jambrovic v Day; Jambrovic v Day [2017] NSWSC 1468
Dr Day breached his duty of care to Mr Jambrovic by failing to provide adequate risk warnings, failing to discuss viable conservative treatment, and not disclosing his lack of training and experience in the recommended surgical procedure. Causation was established as, with proper advice, Mr Jambrovic would not have...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Negligence Action (medical Negligence) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for Mr and Mrs Jambrovic.
- Legal Topics
- ['duty to Warn' 'informed Consent' 'professional Negligence' 'causation' 'damages']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Negligence Action (medical Negligence) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What was the nature and extent of risk warnings provided by Dr Day to Mr Jambrovic?' 'Did Dr Day discuss or recommend alternative treatment options to Mr Jambrovic?' 'Was Dr Day appropriately trained and experienced to perform the surgery?' 'Should Dr Day have recommended or performed the surgery?' 'What damages are appropriate?']
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Day breached his duty of care to Mr Jambrovic by failing to provide adequate risk warnings, failing to discuss viable conservative treatment, and not disclosing his lack of training and experience in the recommended surgical procedure. Causation was established as, with proper advice, Mr Jambrovic would not have proceeded with surgery at that time and/or would have insisted on a trained and experienced surgeon, reducing the risk of harm. Judgment for Mr and Mrs Jambrovic with damages awarded according to both agreed and judicially determined categories.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Mr and Mrs Jambrovic.
Orders
- ['Judgment for Mr and Mrs Jambrovic against Dr Day.' 'Damages awarded as agreed or assessed, subject to a 3% discount for future care as per Malec v JC Hutton principle.' 'Damages for Mrs Jambrovic as agreed (non-economic loss at 33% of a most extreme case).' 'Damages for Mr Jambrovic as agreed in part (non-economic...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment