Augusto Piras v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 396
The applicant failed to establish any error on the part of the primary judge in declining to allow withdrawal of the guilty plea, did not demonstrate judicial bias or miscarriage of justice, and no grounds for leave to appeal were made out.
- Parties
- Applicant: Augusto Piras; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused and application dismissed. Extension of time granted for making application.
- Legal Topics
- Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas, Judicial Bias, Appellate Review of Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Augusto Piras
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to appeal the refusal to allow withdrawal of a guilty plea
- 2 Whether there was judicial bias by the trial judge
- 3 Whether the original plea was made under improper pressure or due to incompetence of counsel
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish any error on the part of the primary judge in declining to allow withdrawal of the guilty plea, did not demonstrate judicial bias or miscarriage of justice, and no grounds for leave to appeal were made out.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused and application dismissed. Extension of time granted for making application.
Orders
- Applicant granted such extension of time as may be necessary for lodging application under section 5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW)
- Leave to appeal refused and application for such leave dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment