Environment Protection Authority v Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWLEC 98
The court found that Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd, through its controlling mind Mr Mouawad, knowingly supplied false and misleading information about asbestos waste disposal, which did not originate from Suez and was not disposed of as claimed. The defendant's lack of appearance and evidence of substituted service permitted the ex parte hearing, and facts proved the elements of both offences under s 144AA(2) POEO Act beyond reasonable doubt.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Environment Protection Authority; Defendant: Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Liability Judgment Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Two charges proved beyond reasonable doubt; arrangements for sentencing to be made.
- Legal Topics
- False or Misleading Information About Waste, Corporate Attribution of Mental State, Substituted Service, Ex Parte Proceedings, Evidentiary Principles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environment Protection Authority
Prosecutor
Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Liability Judgment Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant knowingly supplied false information about waste
- 2 Whether the actions and state of mind of Mr Mouawad can be attributed to the corporate defendant
- 3 Whether the information was supplied in the course of dealing with waste and was false in a material respect
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Aussie Earthmovers Pty Ltd, through its controlling mind Mr Mouawad, knowingly supplied false and misleading information about asbestos waste disposal, which did not originate from Suez and was not disposed of as claimed. The defendant's lack of appearance and evidence of substituted service permitted the ex parte hearing, and facts proved the elements of both offences under s 144AA(2) POEO Act beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
Two charges proved beyond reasonable doubt; arrangements for sentencing to be made.
Orders
- Proceedings No. 104771 and 104773 of 2018 to be heard and determined in the absence of the Defendant pursuant to s 250 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986
- Both charges of knowingly supplying false information proved beyond reasonable doubt; sentencing arrangements to be made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment