Austin Engineering Ltd v Podulova (No 2) [2023] FCA 1627

Austin Engineering Ltd v Podulova (No 2) [2023] FCA 1627

Both parties acted reasonably in their conduct, including regarding confidentiality undertakings and the making and resolution of the application. The matter was ultimately resolved by conferral and consent, and there was no effective surrender, capitulation, or unreasonableness. The appropriate order is for costs to be costs in the cause, consistent with principle that encourages resolution of interlocutory disputes.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application Within General Civil Proceedings / Costs Determination After Agreed Resolution, No Hearing on the Merits
Outcome
Costs of the interlocutory application filed 8 August 2023 to be costs in the cause; reasons provided to parties before publication; liberty to apply for further orders about publication.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'interlocutory Applications' 'confidentiality Orders']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'interlocutory Applications' 'confidentiality Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application Within General Civil Proceedings / Costs Determination After Agreed Resolution, No Hearing on the Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether costs should be ordered and in what terms following interlocutory application resolved by agreement without hearing on the merits']

Ratio Decidendi

Both parties acted reasonably in their conduct, including regarding confidentiality undertakings and the making and resolution of the application. The matter was ultimately resolved by conferral and consent, and there was no effective surrender, capitulation, or unreasonableness. The appropriate order is for costs to be costs in the cause, consistent with principle that encourages resolution of interlocutory disputes.

Court Disposition

Costs of the interlocutory application filed 8 August 2023 to be costs in the cause; reasons provided to parties before publication; liberty to apply for further orders about publication.

Orders

  • ['A copy of the reasons for these orders be provided to the applicant and second to seventh respondents before publication.' 'The applicant and second to seventh respondents have liberty to apply for further or other orders concerning the publication of the reasons for judgment by 31 January 2024, failing which the...