Australand Holdings Limited, Australand Property Limited, Australand Wholesale Investments Limited, Australand Wholesale Investments Limited [2005] NSWSC 835
The responsible entities of the managed investment schemes are justified in convening scheme meetings and that the proposed scheme of arrangement and associated proposals can proceed to consideration by the relevant members. The concerns regarding minority expropriation and trustee contracting with itself do not...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Australand Holdings Limited; Plaintiff: Australand Property Limited; Plaintiff: Australand Wholesale Investments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Managed Investment Schemes / Orders for Convening of Meetings of Members for Scheme of Arrangement and Judicial Advice to Responsible Entities
- Outcome
- Orders made
- Legal Topics
- Managed Investment Schemes, Scheme of Arrangement, Judicial Advice, Compulsory Acquisition, Voting of Scheme Members
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australand Holdings Limited
Plaintiff
Australand Property Limited
Plaintiff
Australand Wholesale Investments Limited
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Corporations Managed Investment Schemes / Orders for Convening of Meetings of Members for Scheme of Arrangement and Judicial Advice to Responsible Entities
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether responsible entities are justified in convening meetings of unit holders to consider merger/scheme proposals
- 2 Whether Gambotto v WCP Limited principles regarding expropriation and member protection apply to managed investment schemes
- 3 Whether trustee may contract with itself in different capacities as responsible entity of two trusts
Ratio Decidendi
The responsible entities of the managed investment schemes are justified in convening scheme meetings and that the proposed scheme of arrangement and associated proposals can proceed to consideration by the relevant members. The concerns regarding minority expropriation and trustee contracting with itself do not preclude taking the proposals to members, and valuation for voting purposes is to be determined under s.253F(c) as the interests are not 'quoted' independently.
Court Disposition
Orders made
Orders
- Orders for convening meeting of Australand Holdings Limited shareholders to consider scheme of arrangement under s.411(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- Orders that responsible entities of Australand Property Trust, Australand Wholesale Property Trust No 4, and Australand Wholesale Property Trust No 5 justified in convening meetings of members for proposals as put forth in minutes/orders initialed and dated in proceedings 4293/05, 4294/05, 4295/05, and 4296/05
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment