Australasian Memory Pty Limited v Brien [2000] HCA 30

Australasian Memory Pty Limited v Brien [2000] HCA 30

Section 447A of the Corporations Law gives courts a broad power to make orders affecting the operation of Part 5.3A in relation to a particular company, including altering how its provisions apply, where necessary to cure procedural irregularities in creditors’ meetings, so long as no unjust interference with accrued or vested rights arises. The appeal against the orders made below to validate procedural defects was therefore dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Australasian Memory Pty Limited; Appellant: B C Amor; Respondent: Richard Campbell Brien; Respondent: [Second Respondent]
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (after Court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
External Administration, Deed of Company Arrangement, Powers of Court Under Part 5.3 a, Section 447 a, Irregularities in Creditors' Meetings, Retrospective Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Australasian Memory Pty Limited

Appellant

B C Amor

Appellant

Richard Campbell Brien

Respondent

[Second Respondent]

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (after Court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Extent of court's power under s 447A of the Corporations Law to make orders affecting operation of Part 5.3A in relation to a company
  2. 2 Whether s 447A allows orders that alter statutory time periods or retrospectively validate procedural irregularities under Part 5.3A
  3. 3 Relationship between s 447A and s 1322 of the Corporations Law

Ratio Decidendi

Section 447A of the Corporations Law gives courts a broad power to make orders affecting the operation of Part 5.3A in relation to a particular company, including altering how its provisions apply, where necessary to cure procedural irregularities in creditors’ meetings, so long as no unjust interference with accrued or vested rights arises. The appeal against the orders made below to validate procedural defects was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The second appellant is to pay the respondents' costs.