Australco Industries P/L v. Weinstock, D.I. & Ors [1994] FCA 966
By mid-January 1991, Yabe Constructions Pty Ltd and the associated project owners were unable to pay their debts as they became due, and the directors knew or ought to have known this when incurring the debt to Australco. The statutory conditions for liability under s 592(1) of the Corporations Law were satisfied....
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australco Industries Pty Limited (ACN 003 974 007); First Respondent: Daniel Isaac Weinstock; Second Respondent: Gregory Vaughan Pooley; Third Respondent: William Eric Copp
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Liquidation Liability Proceeding / Application for Orders Under S 592 of the Corporations Law
- Outcome
- Judgment for applicant against respondents
- Legal Topics
- Director Liability, Liquidation, Insolvent Trading
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australco Industries Pty Limited (ACN 003 974 007)
Applicant
Daniel Isaac Weinstock
First Respondent
Gregory Vaughan Pooley
Second Respondent
William Eric Copp
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Corporations Liquidation Liability Proceeding / Application for Orders Under S 592 of the Corporations Law
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether directors of a company in liquidation with no assets are personally liable for its debts under s 592(1) of the Corporations Law
- 2 Whether, when the company incurred the debt, there were reasonable grounds to expect it would not be able to pay all its debts as and when they became due
Ratio Decidendi
By mid-January 1991, Yabe Constructions Pty Ltd and the associated project owners were unable to pay their debts as they became due, and the directors knew or ought to have known this when incurring the debt to Australco. The statutory conditions for liability under s 592(1) of the Corporations Law were satisfied. The directors are therefore jointly and severally liable for the debt.
Court Disposition
Judgment for applicant against respondents
Orders
- Judgment for the applicant against the respondents for $68,509.50
- The respondents are to pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment