AUSTRALIAGEN OFFICE PORTFOLIO SUB TC PTY LTD v NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL [2017] NSWLEC 1309
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Orders Made After a Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 276/16 approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'building Identification Sign' 'section 34 Orders']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Orders Made After a Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979" 'Whether leave should be granted to the Applicant to rely on amended plans treated by the parties as minor amendments for the purposes of section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; therefore the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement, uphold the appeal and approve the development application subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 276/16 approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the amended plans set out in Condition A1 of Annexure A. The parties agree that the amendments are minor for the purposes of section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 276/16 for the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
3 paragraphs
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AUSTRALIAGEN OFFICE PORTFOLIO SUB TC PTY LTD v NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL [2017] NSWLEC 1309 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 23 May 2017 Date of orders: 16 June 2017 Decision date: 16 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AUSTRALIAGEN OFFICE PORTFOLIO SUB TC PTY LTD (Applicant) NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL (Respondent) Representation: Solicitor: Mr G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant) Ms K Gerathy, HWLE (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/40939 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the amended plans set out in Condition A1 of Annexure A. The parties agree that the amendments are minor for the purposes of section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). 2. The appeal is upheld. 3. Development Application No. 276/16 for the removal of existing above parapet signage and the erection of at new "building identification sign" is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure "A" hereto. ………………………. Commissioner Chilcott 40939.17 Chilcott (C) (215 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 16 June 2017