Bond, A. & Ors v. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1988] FCA 241

Bond, A. & Ors v. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1988] FCA 241

The applicants have demonstrated serious questions to be tried regarding whether the Tribunal's failure to provide further particulars amounts to a denial of natural justice and whether the requirements of the Broadcasting Act 1942 and Inquiries Regulations have been met. The balance of convenience favours the granting of interim relief to restrain the Tribunal from proceeding pending determination of these questions, given the potential prejudice to valuable rights if the hearing proceeds without adequate particulars.

Parties
First Applicant: Alan Bond; Second Applicant: Bond Media Limited; Third Applicant: Bond Corporation Holdings Limited; Fourth Applicant: Queensland Television Limited; Fifth Applicant: Consolidated Broadcasting (W.A.) Pty. Limited; Sixth Applicant: Northwest Radio Pty. Limited; Seventh Applicant: Darwin Broadcasters Pty. Limited; Respondent: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 May 1988
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review and Interim Relief / Interlocutory Application (interim Relief)
Outcome
Interim injunction granted; application for interim relief allowed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Natural Justice, Interim Relief, Statutory Interpretation, Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act, Broadcasting Tribunal Inquiries
Administrative Law Broadcasting Law Judicial Review Natural Justice Interim Relief Statutory Interpretation Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act Broadcasting Tribunal Inquiries

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alan Bond

First Applicant

Bond Media Limited

Second Applicant

Bond Corporation Holdings Limited

Third Applicant

Queensland Television Limited

Fourth Applicant

Consolidated Broadcasting (W.A.) Pty. Limited

Fifth Applicant

Northwest Radio Pty. Limited

Sixth Applicant

Darwin Broadcasters Pty. Limited

Seventh Applicant

Australian Broadcasting Tribunal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Judicial Review and Interim Relief / Interlocutory Application (interim Relief)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal denied natural justice by proceeding with an inquiry without giving sufficient particulars
  2. 2 Proper meaning of 'proposes to exercise' substantive powers under s.17C(1) of the Broadcasting Act 1942
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal complied with the requirement to specify and update issues under the Regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants have demonstrated serious questions to be tried regarding whether the Tribunal's failure to provide further particulars amounts to a denial of natural justice and whether the requirements of the Broadcasting Act 1942 and Inquiries Regulations have been met. The balance of convenience favours the granting of interim relief to restrain the Tribunal from proceeding pending determination of these questions, given the potential prejudice to valuable rights if the hearing proceeds without adequate particulars.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction granted; application for interim relief allowed

Orders

  • Respondent (Australian Broadcasting Tribunal) restrained, until further order, from holding the specified inquiry upon the usual undertaking as to damages from the applicants.
  • Costs of the application for interim relief to be the applicants' costs in the proceedings.