Herald-Sun TV Pty Ltd & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1984] FCA 204
The power given to the Tribunal to determine 'standards' under s 16(1)(d) of the Broadcasting and Television Act is sufficiently broad to allow the use of qualitative or subjective criteria and preclassification of programs, as these measures serve the public interest purpose of the Act and are not inconsistent with the statutory scheme. The challenged provisions are not ultra vires or invalid.
- Parties
- Applicants: Herald-Sun TV Pty Limited & Ors; Respondent: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Judgment on Validity of Administrative Standards and Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Meaning of 'standards' Under Broadcasting and Television Act, Subjectivity in Administrative Standards, Preclassification of Television Programs, Judicial Review Under ADJR Act, Discretion on Interim Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Herald-Sun TV Pty Limited & Ors
Applicants
Australian Broadcasting Tribunal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Judgment on Validity of Administrative Standards and Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Children's Television Standards set by the Tribunal are invalid for relying on subjective criteria
- 2 Whether the requirement of preclassification of programs by the Tribunal exceeds the Tribunal's power to determine 'standards' under s 16(1)(d) of the Broadcasting and Television Act
Ratio Decidendi
The power given to the Tribunal to determine 'standards' under s 16(1)(d) of the Broadcasting and Television Act is sufficiently broad to allow the use of qualitative or subjective criteria and preclassification of programs, as these measures serve the public interest purpose of the Act and are not inconsistent with the statutory scheme. The challenged provisions are not ultra vires or invalid.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed
- Applicants to pay the costs of the respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment