Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Syme Library Case) [2018] FCA 1142
The Court found the CFMEU and its officer Mr Theodorou, as well as Harris Interiors' officers Darker and Dwyer, contravened various sections of the Fair Work Act by making misleading representations, threats amounting to adverse action, and engaging in coercion to pressure Hughes Demolition to enter an enterprise agreement, and discriminated against them through a work stoppage for not having an EBA. The CFMEU was liable for its officers' conduct under statutory attribution of acts and state of mind. Contraventions by work stoppage were not established for Mr Theodorou, but liability under specified sections and for the discrimination by Harris Interiors' officers was made out.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner; First Respondent: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union; Second Respondent: Theo Theodorou; Third Respondent: Harris HMC Interiors (VIC) Pty Ltd; Fourth Respondent: Carmelo Silvestro; Fifth Respondent: Shanne Darker; Sixth Respondent: Jason Dwyer
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application for Declarations and Penalties Under Fair Work Act and Related Statutes / Post Trial Judgment and Interlocutory Orders
- Outcome
- Findings of contraventions of ss 345, 349, 340, 343, 348, and 354 by specified respondents; further hearing on relief directed.
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Action, Coercion, Misrepresentation, Discrimination, Enterprise Agreements, General Protections, Industrial Activity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
Applicant
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
First Respondent
Theo Theodorou
Second Respondent
Harris HMC Interiors (VIC) Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Carmelo Silvestro
Fourth Respondent
Shanne Darker
Fifth Respondent
Jason Dwyer
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application for Declarations and Penalties Under Fair Work Act and Related Statutes / Post Trial Judgment and Interlocutory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents contravened ss 340, 343, 345, 348, 349, and 354 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
- 2 Whether CFMEU and officers made false or misleading representations regarding enterprise agreement obligations
- 3 Whether Harris Interiors and officers took adverse action or engaged in coercion or discrimination as alleged
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the CFMEU and its officer Mr Theodorou, as well as Harris Interiors' officers Darker and Dwyer, contravened various sections of the Fair Work Act by making misleading representations, threats amounting to adverse action, and engaging in coercion to pressure Hughes Demolition to enter an enterprise agreement, and discriminated against them through a work stoppage for not having an EBA. The CFMEU was liable for its officers' conduct under statutory attribution of acts and state of mind. Contraventions by work stoppage were not established for Mr Theodorou, but liability under specified sections and for the discrimination by Harris Interiors' officers was made out.
Court Disposition
Findings of contraventions of ss 345, 349, 340, 343, 348, and 354 by specified respondents; further hearing on relief directed.
Orders
- The further hearing of the application be listed at 10.15 am on 14 August 2018.
- Applicant to file and serve affidavits and outline of submissions regarding penalties and relief by 7 August 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment