Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Monash Freeway Widening Case) [2022] FCAFC 59
The Full Court found that the factual findings underlying the contravention of s 500 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) were affected by appealable error, as the Commissioner's case regarding the 'Gate 3 Incident' was not proven to the requisite standard considering the totality of the evidence, notably the inconsistencies between the main witnesses and the lack of corroborative contemporaneous records. Consequently, the finding of contravention and related penalties could not stand.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union; Second Appellant: James Simpson; Respondent: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Contravention of Fair Work Act S 500, Permit Holder Conduct, Standard of Proof, Pecuniary Penalties, Appellate Review of Findings of Fact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
First Appellant
James Simpson
Second Appellant
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the finding of contravention of s 500 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) was open on the evidence
- 2 The role of the appellate court in reviewing factual findings based on witness credibility
- 3 Whether the standard of proof was met for the alleged improper conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The Full Court found that the factual findings underlying the contravention of s 500 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) were affected by appealable error, as the Commissioner's case regarding the 'Gate 3 Incident' was not proven to the requisite standard considering the totality of the evidence, notably the inconsistencies between the main witnesses and the lack of corroborative contemporaneous records. Consequently, the finding of contravention and related penalties could not stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- Orders in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the orders made by the primary judge on 14 September 2021 are set aside and substituted as follows:
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment