Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Quest Apartments Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 163
Appropriate pecuniary penalties should be imposed on both Mr Farrugia and the CFMEU for contraventions of s 348 of the Fair Work Act on each relevant day, having regard to the seriousness of the conduct, the need for deterrence, the CFMEU’s continuing recidivism, and the parity principle. No suspension of penalty is warranted, and declarations should be made to reinforce the findings of contravention.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty Judgment After Liability Judgment
- Outcome
- Pecuniary penalties imposed; declarations made; proceeding otherwise dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['freedom of Association' 'union Misconduct' 'civil Penalties' 'coercion' 'adverse Action' 'false Representation' 'pecuniary Penalty' 'recidivism']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty Judgment After Liability Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What are the appropriate pecuniary penalties for contraventions of ss 346(b), 348, and 349(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)?' 'Should any penalty imposed upon Mr Farrugia be wholly suspended?' 'Is it appropriate to grant declaratory relief regarding the contraventions?']
Ratio Decidendi
Appropriate pecuniary penalties should be imposed on both Mr Farrugia and the CFMEU for contraventions of s 348 of the Fair Work Act on each relevant day, having regard to the seriousness of the conduct, the need for deterrence, the CFMEU’s continuing recidivism, and the parity principle. No suspension of penalty is warranted, and declarations should be made to reinforce the findings of contravention.
Court Disposition
Pecuniary penalties imposed; declarations made; proceeding otherwise dismissed
Orders
- ['Second Respondent (Godwin Farrugia) to pay $4,000 for contravention of s 348 on 17 March 2014.' 'Second Respondent to pay $6,000 for contravention of s 348 on 31 March 2014.' 'First Respondent (CFMEU) to pay $45,000 for contravention of s 348 on 17 March 2014.' 'First Respondent to pay $50,000 for contravention of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment