Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Adams [2018] FCA 1520
A pecuniary penalty of $1,400 per respondent is reasonable and proportionate for first-time contraventions of s 417(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), considering the need for general deterrence, the absence of evidence of significant loss, and lack of prior contraventions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty Assessment After Liability Found, Remitted After Appeal
- Outcome
- Pecuniary penalty imposed on each relevant respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['pecuniary Penalties' 'industrial Action' 'general Deterrence' 'first Offenders' 'penalty Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty Assessment After Liability Found, Remitted After Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate pecuniary penalty for contraventions of s 417(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the respondents?' 'What factors are relevant to determining penalty in industrial laws breaches by first-time offenders?']
Ratio Decidendi
A pecuniary penalty of $1,400 per respondent is reasonable and proportionate for first-time contraventions of s 417(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), considering the need for general deterrence, the absence of evidence of significant loss, and lack of prior contraventions.
Court Disposition
Pecuniary penalty imposed on each relevant respondent.
Orders
- ['A penalty of $1,400 is imposed on each of the 1st through 44th and 46th through to 76th respondents for contravening s 417(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).' 'Penalties are to be paid to the Commonwealth.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment