Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 93
The appeal was dismissed because proof of some adverse impact is required to establish discrimination against another person under s 45 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth), and no evidence was provided that Hanlon Labour Services Pty Ltd suffered any such impact as a result of the respondent's conduct. Differential treatment alone does not amount to adverse discrimination under s 45.
- Parties
- Appellant: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner; Respondent: McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd (ACN 002 929 017)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discrimination Against Employer, Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act S 45, Interpretation of Statutory Phrases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
Appellant
McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd (ACN 002 929 017)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'discriminate against' in s 45 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) requires proof of adverse impact
- 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence of adverse impact to Hanlon Labour Services Pty Ltd
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because proof of some adverse impact is required to establish discrimination against another person under s 45 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth), and no evidence was provided that Hanlon Labour Services Pty Ltd suffered any such impact as a result of the respondent's conduct. Differential treatment alone does not amount to adverse discrimination under s 45.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The Appellant is to pay the costs of the Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment